In Stitch in Crime, from when they do a search of the operating theatre and when Mayfield comes into his office to find Columbo sitting there, there is a period of time when Columbo is on his own. Couldn't Mayfield state that Columbo planted the suture on himself?

I never thought of that but it wouldn't be the first time Columbo planted evidence, he planted a contact lens in the trunk of Brimmer's car. And I'm sure there are other examples.

True about Brimmer, but if Columbo plants evidence, he normally owns up to it at the end. Like the contact lense, or the information re the fake travel tickets.

I hate to get a little gross, but wouldn't it be pretty obvious whether or not the suture just came out of a body? If so, and Columbo DID plant suture of his own, he might have been in for some real trouble.

But when Ray Milland's character asks where the contact lens in Brimmer's trunk came from, didn't Columbo answer "Who knows"?

Dagger of the Mind's my favorite example of evidence-diddling, complete with a great childhood back story. Of course, that was in a different jurisdiction, so who knows if that would have been admissible?

However, I think we could assume Columbo's using legally fishy bluffs to extract an admission would give the prosecutor grounds for an indictment, especially if Columbo admitted his ruse. At least in the world of TV. In the real world, the boys and girls of Hawaii Five-O (current version) would have long been thrown in a maximum-security facility, Patrick Jane's Mentalist would have been collecting unemployment (SPOILER AHEAD) long before being ludicrously acquitted for killing the wrong Red John in a crowded shopping mall. Love both shows, though I'm not sure I'd want these guys working my hood.

I believe that, in US law at least, there's such a thing as acceptable deception. As long as it is after the fact (i.e. not entrapment), this kind of thing can be used to establish lines of inquiry and/or extract admissible evidence.

We have to wonder why Mayfield would not claim this, and of course if he did, we would not have the fun of watching a seriously dislikeable character apprehended.

This episode is one of my favorites. But we have to forget reality in a number of areas. First, that the good doctor is wide awake and able to speak to a detective - only hours after open heart surgery.

The other is that the suture that Columbo takes from his surgery garb has no blood on it - at all.

So Dr. Mayfield would HAVE to say Columbo planted the suture. Even if he didn't he would be freed after ten minutes in jail - his lawyer would bring up the evidence immediatel.

Of course we are supposed to ignore the bloodless suture so it does not play into the story.

This is a very good point. And even before that, I can't understand how a team of highly skilled surgeons who had been instructed to watch Dr. Mayfield's every move would fail to see what happened to the dissolving suture that was already in Dr. Heidemann's heart.

He plants evidence in s2e4 - the ep in England. Had the individuals been innocent, they would have been convicted unfortunately because of Columbo's guesses.