The Lt. Columbo Forum

An area where fans from all over can ask each other questions and voice their own ideas and opinions on anything Columbo.

This Forum is fondly dedicated in memory of  "cassavetes45"  (Carleen Zink),
Columbo's greatest fan and a great friend to us all.
​​​​​​​
The Lt. Columbo Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
" Shooting Columbo".

Just finished this new book that chronicles the behind-the scene production of all the eps. and movies.
It's a bit depressing to read of the constant battles between Falk and the studios and networks.
I admire his insistence that the show maintain its quality, especially when it came to scripts.
Not so admirable are his own constant demands over money and personell that threatened to delay and sabotage the show.
The revived series especially suffered from this behavior.

A must read for COLUMBO fans but it's not a tome that warrants rereading.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

Interesting info, Bruce, and thanks for sharing. Without asking you to give away the entire book, would you be able to give an example or two of how the revived series suffered from Falk's behavior? There was such a different tenor to the latter episodes as a whole and I've always wondered what was really behind this.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

One reason was they couldn't afford top rank guest star villains.
Falk took almost complete control of the series so alot is down to him for the change in tone

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

Hmmm, that's interesting. So, he sort of sabotaged himself in the process.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

Hmmm, that's interesting. So, he sabotaged himself.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

For the unflinching take on the show’s successes AND shortcomings, I’d say it’s a must-read for any fan. Probably a more unbiased look than the beloved ColumboPhile.

The most surprising part for me was that a lot of the unfunny comedy “padding” in longer episodes (the “waiting for the computer” scene in Exercise in Fatality, for example) was mostly put in at Falk’s insistence. His exaggerated comedy tastes were tempered in the earlier seasons - but as he got more power, nobody dared tell him “no.”

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

I think the book is definitely a must-own for serious Columbo fans. Knowing the details warts and all I think is helpful, and it's important all of that is documented in a way that we can access with ease. I was fascinated by stories of the actors who were considered or who backed out of appearing (or in some instances refused because of Falk's quirks. This was why Dick Van **** turned down the John Payne role in "Forgotten Lady" because of his previous experience on the show).

Falk I think over time came to see Columbo more in comedic terms than as a fascinating enigma and that didn't help the quality of the stories over the long haul IMO. Even so, flawed Columbo was often a lot better than anything else on TV in that era.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

According to the author of the book , he put that idiotic tuba scene in also.
The emphasis on comedy is probably the single element that most harmed the revival.
Highly recommend.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

UGH! Tell me no more, Bruce Marshall. This is so disappointing to hear. I mean, it's only a TV show, but it's still a shame we could have better quality latter episodes were it not for (apparently) Falk's ego.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

John
UGH! Tell me no more, Bruce Marshall. This is so disappointing to hear. I mean, it's only a TV show, but it's still a shame we could have better quality latter episodes were it not for (apparently) Falk's ego.
One thing that was NOT Falk's fault; the increase in commercials.
I stopped watching live and taped the episodes so I could fast forward thru the pace killing breaks!

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

Yes, I saw "Murder Under Glass" was on TV the other night. It was unbearable. There were at least six commercials before the dining room scene with the Geishas at Paul Gerard's house. Then came another set of commercials and I turned on my DVD. It's why the Complete Set is such a good move.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

The biggest horror story involving a 70s episode involves "Old Fashioned Murder." That always came off as unsatisfying and now we know the reason why. Falk allowed a crony, Elaine May, to basically take over the whole production of that episode and there was endless tinkering, rewriting, etc. that made production stretch out forever. The "Lawrence Vail" writing credit was really Peter Fischer taking his name off the original script that he felt had been ruined completely.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

I always felt that Old Fashioned Murder was one of the most boring shows in the series. The characters were dull and uncharismatic,

The plot is very similar to Playback, but not nearly as good.

Re: " Shooting Columbo".

The book is definitely worthwhile reading. It certainly casts a different light on Peter Falk. A lot of what prevented more episodes from being made was his own doing. He allowed the show to go way over budget by disregarding shooting schedules, spending multiple extra days reshooting and “perfecting” scenes. He hired his friends without permission and allowed them to interfere with scripts. And he was responsible for much of the excessive humor. I agree with what has been stated that the lesser Columbos are still decent, but it is a shame that certain things could have been so much better.