Living in London and only managing to see the team two or three times a season, I am reluctant to pass comment on the performance of the team. However, having been at the Elgin City game, I feel compelled to mention something that has been bothering me. Having had to work hard to get back into the game after a pretty dreadful start, I thought we had Elgin on the back foot before half-time. I agree with Jonathan Page (recorded interview) that half-time came at a bad time for us.

It looked to me that we were going through the motions in the first 20 minutes of the second-half. Why? We should have been driving home the psychological advantage gained in hauling back a two-goal deficit. We did not threaten Elgin during this period of the game and looked happy to knock the ball around with no great intent. I became increasingly uneasy about us allowing Elgin to relax.

Listening to the manager in his recorded interview after the game, he said, "...quite a non-eventful 15-20 minutes (of the second-half)... it seemed that each team was happy to be at 2-2..." Well Gary, I was not happy and you should not have been so either.

The sense of injustice over Elgin's third goal and falling behind again had the immediate effect of stirring us into action. The tempo of our play quickened and we started creating lots of chances. The change in our play was so marked it has been bugging me since. Why could we not do this before Elgin's disputed third goal?