I keep getting asked questions. Obviously I cannot disclose confidential details but will try and give you answers via information already in the public domain.

"Following a board meeting on Saturday, the club has announced four new associate directors _ all previous directors at the club.
Former chairman Bruce Black has been appointed company secretary and Jim Stevenson as football secretary, while John Barclay will work on commercial matters.
Dave Marshall, who resigned as a director in protest against Mr Brown, will look after the stadium. All are set to become full directors in due course."

The above was published in the East Fife Mail some time ago. This would indicate that four new directors would be appointed to the board.

Why it did not happen at the AGM when it would have been logical to do so I cannot answer.

In due course means what it says ie when it is decided by the powers that be. It would seem that their confirmation as board members will not happen until the next AGM. Although there may be means for it to take place earlier; but I would think that would be rather cunbersome and if it was going to happen it would already have taken place.

Do I think their appointment would safeguard the club rather than keeping the power in the few hands it is now? You may think that but I could not possibly answer.

Would any of them be daft enough to join the gang of numpties (some with money, some with none) now in charge of the club? I'd be surprised. Being a Director carries legal responsibilities and in this day and age it isn't wise to be involved with a club that pays players partly in cash (nod, nod, wink, wink).