The Lt. Columbo Forum

An area where fans from all over can ask each other questions and voice their own ideas and opinions on anything Columbo.

This Forum is fondly dedicated in memory of  "cassavetes45"  (Carleen Zink),
Columbo's greatest fan and a great friend to us all.
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
The Lt. Columbo Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: A Stitch in Crime - Columbo plants evidence...?

Dagger of the Mind's my favorite example of evidence-diddling, complete with a great childhood back story. Of course, that was in a different jurisdiction, so who knows if that would have been admissible?

However, I think we could assume Columbo's using legally fishy bluffs to extract an admission would give the prosecutor grounds for an indictment, especially if Columbo admitted his ruse. At least in the world of TV. In the real world, the boys and girls of Hawaii Five-O (current version) would have long been thrown in a maximum-security facility, Patrick Jane's Mentalist would have been collecting unemployment (SPOILER AHEAD) long before being ludicrously acquitted for killing the wrong Red John in a crowded shopping mall. Love both shows, though I'm not sure I'd want these guys working my hood.

Re: A Stitch in Crime - Columbo plants evidence...?

I believe that, in US law at least, there's such a thing as acceptable deception. As long as it is after the fact (i.e. not entrapment), this kind of thing can be used to establish lines of inquiry and/or extract admissible evidence.

Re: A Stitch in Crime - Columbo plants evidence...?

We have to wonder why Mayfield would not claim this, and of course if he did, we would not have the fun of watching a seriously dislikeable character apprehended.

This episode is one of my favorites. But we have to forget reality in a number of areas. First, that the good doctor is wide awake and able to speak to a detective - only hours after open heart surgery.

The other is that the suture that Columbo takes from his surgery garb has no blood on it - at all.

So Dr. Mayfield would HAVE to say Columbo planted the suture. Even if he didn't he would be freed after ten minutes in jail - his lawyer would bring up the evidence immediatel.

Of course we are supposed to ignore the bloodless suture so it does not play into the story.

Re: A Stitch in Crime - Columbo plants evidence...?

This is a very good point. And even before that, I can't understand how a team of highly skilled surgeons who had been instructed to watch Dr. Mayfield's every move would fail to see what happened to the dissolving suture that was already in Dr. Heidemann's heart.

Re: A Stitch in Crime - Columbo plants evidence...?

He plants evidence in s2e4 - the ep in England. Had the individuals been innocent, they would have been convicted unfortunately because of Columbo's guesses.